Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv09240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
ROSADO v. BARRACKS et al
as 2:2019cv05068
Defendant:
PSP. TROOPER MICHAEL P. D-U-G-A-N, LESLIE S. RICHARDS, PENNSYLVANIA. STATE. (DMV) and others
Plaintiff:
GERONIMO F. ROSADO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. McDaniel et al
as 2:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
Ernest W L Thompson
Defendant:
Ivory T McDaniel, S Chapman and Jermy Sykes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kanuszewski et al
as 2:2018cv10472
Plaintiff:
Adam Kanuszewski , Ashley Kanuszewski , D W L (Minor Child) and others
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Health and Human Services , Nick Lyons , Sandip Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
My'Ka El v. R. Reese
as 17-2300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MY'KA EL
Defendant - Appellee:
R. REESE, Officer
Defendant:
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, M. SULLIVAN, Officer, S. SELOGY, Officer and others
My'Ka El v. R. Reese
as 17-6397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MY'KA EL
Defendant - Appellee:
R. REESE, Officer
Defendant:
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, M. SULLIVAN, Officer, S. SELOGY, Officer and others
M.L. et al v. Smith et al
as 8:2016cv03236
Plaintiff:
W. L. , C. L. and M. L.
Defendant:
Jack R. Smith and Montgomery County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv60580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
