Cases 91 - 100 of 345
(PC) Jacques v. Quick et al
as 2:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jacques and Michael Euzel Jacques
Defendant:
R. Quick and J. Bordewick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY R. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. LOCKLEAR
as 1:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LT. MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Youngman et al
as 3:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
Spencer Martin
Defendant:
C/O Youngman, C/O Montroy, C/O Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quick v. Houma et al
as 3:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Quick and Jeremy R Quick
Defendant:
Police Dept Houma, Dana Picou Babin and Sharon Trahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, SGT. MS. NEALLY, CAPTAIN MR. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reginald Jones v. Sandra Quick, et al
as 22-1237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGINALD JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
SANDRA QUICK and FRANK LAWRENCE, Warden, Chief Administrative Officer, Menard CC
McClam v. Filyaw et al
as 6:2021cv03944
Plaintiff:
Lethe McClam
Defendant:
Charles Filyaw, Tommie Brogdon, Jeff Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CLARK et al
as 2:2021cv04924
Plaintiff:
MS. KIMBERLY BROWN and KIMBERLY BROWN
Defendant:
MAYOR MAURICE CLARK, SR., OFFICER DONALD QUICK, OFFICER MICHAEL HALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUICK v. WATSON
as 1:2021cv00823
Plaintiff:
DARRIS QUICK
Defendant:
SERGANT WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
