Cases 101 - 110 of 3,028
Cole (PS) v. El Paso County Deputy et al
as 1:2023cv03430
Plaintiff:
Jack Cole
Defendant:
El Paso County Deputy and Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Hamilton
as 5:2023cv01182
Petitioner:
Cole Isaac Phillips
Respondent:
Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Boykins et al
as 2:2023cv02803
Plaintiff:
Justin T. Johnson
Defendant:
K. Boykins, Off. Bailey, D.R.T. Off. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kathleen Johnson v. Donnie Day, et al
as 23-4011
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN DIANE JOHNSON
Defendant:
DONNIE DAY, MORGAN STYLES, COLE PIATT and others
DARDEN v. MARTINI et al
as 1:2023cv02250
Plaintiff:
JAYDEN W. DARDEN
Defendant:
KARL MARTINI, VOLGEMAN, WIEGAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Dehart v. Fresno Superior Court
as 1:2023cv01716
Petitioner:
Jeremy Cole Dehart
Respondent:
Fresno Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Humphreys v. Securus Phone et al
as 4:2023cv05171
Plaintiff:
Scott W Humphreys
Defendant:
Securus Phone, More, A More and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Council et al v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council, Kinetik Justice, Lee Edward Moore, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Leigh Gwathney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Clinton
as 9:2023cv01555
Petitioner:
John W. Cole
Respondent:
J. Clinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Korrell Santana Cole v. Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2023cv10392
Plaintiff:
Korrell Santana Cole
Defendant:
Los Angeles County, Dep. Palencia, Robert Luna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
