Cases 101 - 110 of 385
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2021cv01717
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
Secretary John E. Wetzel, Superintendent Jamey P. Luther, Officer Harpster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moraga v. Jane Doe #1 et al
as 3:2021cv00440
Plaintiff:
Roy D. Moraga
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Virgina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00919
Plaintiff:
Paulus Irvin Perkins
Defendant:
Virgina Department of Corrections, Virgina Department of Corrections Board, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willette v. Michel et al
as 2:2021cv00917
Plaintiff:
Theodore R Willette
Defendant:
Heidi Michel, Cpl Hambly, Lt Jolly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Fuwell et al
as 1:2021cv00103
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Taylor Fuwell, Heather Tidwell, Heather Annesser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Sanne
as 6:2021cv00997
Plaintiff:
Benjimin Edward Smith
Defendant:
Jason Meyer, Marion County Sheriffs Office and Medical Staff at Jail, Sgt Cherno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Jr et al v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2021cv02807
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #2, Cermak Health Services, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Lorenzo Dwayne Thomas Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Keen et al
as 4:2021cv00534
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo J. Williams
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, John Doe 3, Daniel Keen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) et al
as 3:2021cv00440
Defendant:
Ms Smith, Jane Doe #8, Penny George and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jane Doe 2 et al v. Officer S. Merrill et al
as 2:2021cv03630
Plaintiff:
Jane DOE 3 and Jane Doe 2
Defendant:
OFFICER S. MERRILL, J. Spinney, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
