Cases 151 - 160 of 2,554
Lloyd Hammond v. James Green
as 23-5502
Petitioner / Appellant:
LLOYD HAMMOND
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM LANE, Warden, Green River Correctional Complex and JAMES DAVID GREEN, Warden, Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
EISENMANN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01623
Plaintiff:
GARY LANE EISENMANN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grayson Jr v. State of Tennessee, The
as 3:2023cv00549
Petitioner:
Ricky Lane Grayson Jr
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LANE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00432
Petitioner:
PERREN LAMONTE LANE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Curry v. Prowers County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2023cv01331
Plaintiff:
Channing Curry
Defendant:
People of the State of Colorado, Prowers County, Joshua Vogel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Lechuga et al
as 1:2023cv03311
Plaintiff:
Lavonte Ladell Lane
Defendant:
S Lechuga, E Villarreal, R Rodriguez 02 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifford Gooden, III v. Tim Lane
as 23-2277
Petitioner / Appellant:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Lane, Sheriff of Scott County Jail
Lane v. Fuhre
as 6:2023cv00756
Petitioner:
Gilbert Lewis Lowe and Gilbert Lewis Lane
Respondent:
Cory Fuhre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosley v. Williams
as 1:2023cv02260
Petitioner:
Mr. Demetrius Mosley
Respondent:
Mr. Doug Williams, Judge Craig L. Schwall, T. Coun. Tawanna L. Payton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Dever et al
as 5:2023ct03153
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Levon Jones
Defendant:
James C. Dever, III, G. Alan DuBois, April Bun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
