Cases 11 - 20 of 642
Ryan v. Crane et al
as 2:2024cv10539
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Crane, Ulch, Napier and others
Carter v. McCoy et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Carter
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, C. J. Smith, C. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooley v. State of Iowa
as 1:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
Ronald E Cooley
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holder v. Cooley et al
as 2:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Dexter Deangelo Holder
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Col Lofton and Col Tillery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronnie Whitener v. John Patterson
as 24-6049
Plaintiff:
RONNIE DALE WHITENER
Defendant:
JOHN PATTERSON, RCDC Sergeant, in his individual and official capacity, JOHN COOLEY, RCDC Officer, in his individual and official capacity, JOSHUA GOODWIN, RCDC Officer, in his individual and official capacity and others
Cooley v. Alabama Department of Mental Health
as 1:2023cv00475
Petitioner:
Jesse Jr. Cooley
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ledet v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv07270
Plaintiff:
Darval Ledet
Defendant:
Keith Cooley
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crump v. Nagy et al
as 2:2023cv13138
Defendant:
Eric Stockall, Noah Nagy, Tiffani Kisor and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Len Crump
Crow et al v. Schuyler County Sheriff's Office
as 4:2023cv04204
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Crow and Mackenzie Cooley
Defendant:
Schuyler County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard v. Cooley
as 23-30781
Petitioner / Appellant:
Colby Dranoel Leonard
Respondent / Appellee:
Keith Cooley, Warden, Allen Correctional Center and James David "Buddy" Caldwell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
