Cases 11 - 20 of 279
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv01718
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, George Little, Secretary of Department of Corrections, TABE BICKELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanco v. State of Nevada
as 3:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Michell Blanco, Mitchell Blanco and Michel Blanco
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz v. Lopez et al
as 2:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Luis Felipe Cruz Lopez, Gabriela Oceguera, Hector Salomon Galindo Alvarado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lu v. Rocah et al
as 7:2022cv09715
Plaintiff:
Jianqiao Lu
Defendant:
Miriam E. Rocah, Catalina Blanco Buitrago, Letitia A. James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Israel Arroniz v. Chad Blanco
as 5:2022cv02029
Plaintiff:
Israel Arroniz
Defendant:
Chad Blanco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman Blanco v. R. Johnson
as 22-56222
Petitioner / Appellant:
NORMAN PAUL BLANCO
Respondent / Appellee:
R. C. JOHNSON, Warden
Smith v. Prins et al
as 6:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Smith
Defendant:
Craig Prins, C/O Drumonet, C/O K. Engles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanco v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Efrain Blanco
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Patricia A. Coyne-Fague, RIDOC Employee John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Blanco-Rodriguez
as 22-40681
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jorge Ernesto Blanco-Rodriguez
Ricardo Camarillo v. Chad Blanco
as 5:2022cv01670
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Camarillo
Defendant:
Chad Blanco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
