Cases 11 - 20 of 125
Richard Baber, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6280
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD L. BABER, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Faison v. Oneida County et al
as 9:2022cv01346
Plaintiff:
Quinten R. Faison
Defendant:
Oneida County, Nurse Doe, Patnode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Babers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00640
Plaintiff:
Daron Durane Howard, Daron Durane Howard-Bey, Daron Dwane Howard and others
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, Steven T. Marshall, Thomas Hugghins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Bragg et al
as 1:2022cv08651
Plaintiff:
Jinja J. Kyng Pariah Johnson
Defendant:
Alvin Bragg, Donald Trump, Supreme Judge Baber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Babers v. Dennis
as 4:2022cv04080
Plaintiff:
Christopher Babers
Defendant:
Dawn Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Lt. Marvin et al
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Julius A. Hines
Defendant:
Lt. Marvin, Lt. Banks, Captain Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baber v. Augusta County Circuit Court
as 7:2022cv00134
Petitioner:
Richard L. Baber, Jr.
Respondent:
Augusta County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitt v. Babers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, Levar Dixion, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baber v. Dials et al
as 6:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Baber
Defendant:
Adam Dials, Matt Hicks, Joe Pridemore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BABER v. WRIGHT et al
as 2:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
ROBBIE A. BABER
Defendant:
WRIGHT, KNOX COUNTY JAIL STAFF and LAURA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
