Cases 11 - 20 of 1,916
Clifford C. Loyer v. Orange County Health Care Agency
as 8:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
Clifford Chaun Loyer
Defendant:
Orange County Health Care Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyce v. Tillman et al
as 4:2024cv01441
Plaintiff:
Clifford Boyce
Defendant:
Officer Tillman, Officer Jaramillo and Sgt. Kessler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyce v. B. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv01372
Plaintiff:
Clifford Boyce
Defendant:
B. Smith, T. Mitchell and A. Wasson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaynor v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Clifford Gaynor
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Centurion of Florida, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifford C. Loyer v. The United States of America
as 8:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
Clifford Chaun Loyer
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvey v. Swanson
as 4:2024cv10929
Petitioner:
Clifford O'Neal Harvey
Respondent:
Christopher Swanson
Titus v. Akoo Brand et al
as 4:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Michael Iamsui Titus
Defendant:
Akoo Brand, Vladamir Putin, Tesla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Bryant et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
James Hope Turner, 3x
Defendant:
Martin T. Bryant, Beth Cabel, Clifford Mcdonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Range v. Mayfield et al
as 7:2024cv02263
Plaintiff:
Branchaunn Range
Defendant:
Clifford Mayfield, Martin George Palmer, David Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLIFFORD v. WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON, FCI - FT. DIX
as 1:2024cv00870
Petitioner:
STEPHEN FRANCIS CLIFFORD
Respondent:
WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON, FCI - FT. DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
