Cases 11 - 20 of 2,703
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alphonso Tanner v. French, et al
as 24-11098
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
TANNER v. FRENCH et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, DIRECTOR CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amphly v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Amphly
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Michelle Lujan Grisham, Alisha Tafoya Lucero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Howard v. Komaki, et al.
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Emi Komaki, BD Young, C Caldua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Kirkland Corr. Ins/ State of South Carolina
as 0:2024cv01674
Petitioner:
Jerome Curry and (Flesh And Blood Man)
Respondent:
Kirkland Corr. Ins/ South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Woods and Demetrius L Woods
Defendant:
Doe, Gary Musslelwhite, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Curry v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00956
Petitioner:
David Henry Curry
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norred v. TDCJ-CID Byrd Unit et al
as 4:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Norred
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID Byrd Unit, UTMB Correctional Division, Dr. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Currie et al
as 0:2024cv01131
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lawrence
Defendant:
Judge C.M. Currie, John Doe Prison Guard, Jane Doe Prison Guard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
