Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Withers v. Beecken Petty O'Keefe & Company et al
as 2:2017cv03391
Plaintiff:
Michael V Withers
Defendant:
Beecken Petty O'Keefe & Company, Corizon LLC, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Withers v. Beecken Petty O'Keefe and Company et al
as 3:2017cv01229
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Withers
Defendant:
Beecken Petty O'Keefe and Company, Corizon, LLC, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Mosley
as 6:2017cv01666
Petitioner:
Christopher D Spencer
Respondent:
Bonita Mosley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sandoval v. Corizon LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00728
Plaintiff:
Felipe Sandoval
Defendant:
Corizon LLC, D Spencer Sego, Joanne Grafton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCER v. NEEL et al
as 4:2016cv00508
Plaintiff:
LEONARD D SPENCER
Defendant:
C NEEL , A KIRKLAND , FRANCIS ONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCER v. ENGLISH
as 5:2016cv00212
Petitioner:
KEVIN D SPENCER
Respondent:
N C ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Spencer v. City of Milwaukee Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv00662
Plaintiff:
Jerpaul D Spencer
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee Police Department, Edward A Flynn, Michael Vagnini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmond Spencer v. William Rosso, et al
as 15-30926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDMOND D. SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM ROSSO, In his Individual Capacity, CHAD MENZINA, In his Individual Capacity, WILLIE RICHARDSON, In his Individual Capacity and others
Edmond Spencer v. Burl Cain, Warden, et al
as 15-30283
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDMOND D. SPENCER
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY and LOUISIANA STATE
Spencer v. Rosso et al
as 3:2015cv00078
Defendant:
Burl Cain, John Doe, Chad Menzina and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond D. Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
