Cases 11 - 20 of 351
Barker v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Dianne Barker
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of, Scottsdale Police Department, Alan Rodbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Murray v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01847
Plaintiff:
David Murray
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Board of County Commissioners of the County of El Paso, Colorado, The, Joseph Roybal and others
Stokich v. Diss et al
as 1:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
Michael D Stokich
Defendant:
Adam Diss, . Hill, . Cravatta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
MELVIN BERNARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, THOMAS REIMERS, JASON BRENES-CATINCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker v. Phelps et al
as 5:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Sheila Dianne Thacker
Defendant:
Jody Phelps, Shauna, Christy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rubio v. Mason County et al
as 3:2023cv05435
Plaintiff:
Brandon J Rubio
Defendant:
Mason County, Ryan Spurling, Kevin Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winn v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00543
Petitioner:
Dianne M Winn
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Larry Tyler v. James Hudson
as 23-6374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY JAMES TYLER
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES HUDSON, Sheriff and DIANN WILKS
Ziglar v. Skiles et al
as 2:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Ziglar
Defendant:
Diann Skiles, West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation and John/Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merrick v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Merrick
Defendant:
David Shinn, Dianne Miller, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
