Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 50,747
Robbie Newby v. David Leu
as 24-6572
Petitioner: ROBBIE LYNN NEWBY
Respondent: DAVID LEU, Warden
Reed v. Dauzat
as 24-30368
Petitioner: Bobby Ray Reed
Respondent: Michele Dauzat, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
(PC) DePonte v. Stohl et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00695
Plaintiff: David Arthur DePonte
Defendant: Stohl, Stern, J Saucedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00299
Petitioner: Joshua David Nicholas
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bixler v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff: Kagan Cole Bixler
Defendant: Department of Corrections and David Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 9:2024cv00769
Plaintiff: Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant: Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. COCROFT et al
as 2:2024cv03215
Petitioner: DEONDRE E. SMITH
Respondent: Judge Kimberly Cocroft, JEFF ZEZECH, GEORGE WHARTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBISON v. WENGER et al
as 2:2024cv03219
Petitioner: BRADLEY C. ROBISON
Respondent: BEAU D. WENGER, David C Young, COLIN E. PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBISON v. WENGER et al
as 2:2024cv03217
Plaintiff: BRADLEY C. ROBISON
Defendant: BEAU D. WENGER, Scott A Smith, David C Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00725
Plaintiff: David Hamilton
Defendant: Tennessee Department of Correction, Grady Perry, James Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?