Cases 11 - 20 of 230
Dye v. McIntosh County et al
as 6:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jason Grant Dye
Defendant:
McIntosh County, Kevin Ledbetter, Monica Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodson v. Dye et al
as 7:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. T. Dye, Ms. Sater, Mr. Widener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. May et al.
as 3:2023cv02019
Plaintiff:
David F. Welch
Defendant:
Warden Harold May, Ashley D. Veach, Angela F. Raypole and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Coles et al
as 7:2023cv00624
Petitioner:
Jazzman L. Daniel
Defendant:
Coles, Sgt. K. Boyd, Sgt. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dye #785330 v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
David Lyle Dye #785330
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Catherine Bauman, P. Hubble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv04301
Plaintiff:
Antonio Darnell Johnson, Inmates of Clayton County Jail, Christopher Troy Gather and others
Defendant:
Levon Allen, Clayton County Sheriff's Office and Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Squire et al
as 7:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Keyanta Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Sgt. C. Squire, Sgt. N. Bowman, R. Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynie v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Wesley Haynie and Reginald Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Robernett, Ashby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dye #149800 v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Dye #149800
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Sherman Campbell, Unknown Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
