Cases 11 - 20 of 366
Davis v. Leensvart et al
as 1:2021cv00434
Plaintiff:
Lamar Delray Davis
Defendant:
Edward S. Leensvart, E. Thomas, Edmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Wayman et al
as 5:2020ct03091
Defendant:
Scott E. Thomas, Mayor Bloomberg, Allen Wayman and others
Plaintiff:
Offie Curtis Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 9:2018cv03579
Plaintiff:
Charles E Thomas
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. N.Y.S. D.O.C.C.S.
as 9:2018cv01376
Defendant:
N.Y.S. D.O.C.C.S., Dayers, Upstate C.F. Investigative Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Thomas and Bobby A. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Chambers et al
as 3:2018cv00730
Defendant:
Anthony Chambers and E. Thomas Collum, III
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Laviko Tavares Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Atterberry v. Glass et al
as 1:2018cv09067
Defendant:
Sharon L. Janklewicz, Benjamin E. Thomas, John Calvello and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Atterberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Musiddig et al
as 4:2018cv00188
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
D Musiddig, Newburns, McKanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00073
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Murchison v. USA, et al
as 17-3449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH MURCHISON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SAMUELS, Prisons Director and others
Thomas v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv07295
Plaintiff:
Ray E Thomas
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
