Cases 11 - 20 of 315
DeHart v. Montgomery County Fiscal Court et al
as 5:2023cv00311
Executor:
Bonnie DeHart
Defendant:
Montgomery County Fiscal Court, Ian Roberts, Southern Health Partners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ST CLAIR v. KEEN et al
as 4:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE ST CLAIR, JR
Defendant:
KEEN, CPT 1, CPT 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRUBBS v. USA
as 3:2023cv00111
Petitioner:
CLARENCE GRUBBS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ZALE v. LEE et al
as 5:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAVID ZALE, JR
Defendant:
D LEE, SERGEANT GRUBBS, MANAGEMENT AND TRAINING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRUBBS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00582
Petitioner:
JIMMIE V. GRUBBS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Whitten v. Mays et al
as 7:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Antwon Whitten
Defendant:
C. Mays, Gibson and Grubb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Clay County et al
as 6:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Commonwealth Attorney's Office of Clay County, Gary Gregory, Harold Rader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. C/O Childress et al
as 4:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Hopkins
Defendant:
C/O Childress, C/O Combs, Corporal Loomis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Knox et al
as 3:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Dionte Jermaine Davis
Defendant:
Tiffani S. Knox, C. Russell, Tyler Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Wilke et al
as 3:2023cv05117
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Burton and Lonnie Lee Burton
Defendant:
Christopher Grubb, Gina Penrose, Denise Wilkie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
