Cases 11 - 20 of 1,012
Khalaf v. Immigration (ICE)
as 4:2024cv03053
Petitioner:
Sattar Sabri Khalaf
Respondent:
Immigration (ICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilks, Timothy v. Hannula, J. et al
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wilks
Defendant:
Dr. J. Hannula, Dr. R. Maddikunta, RN E. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Prosper et al
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Deron Darnell Love
Defendant:
Bridgette Prosper, Yanu Pusich, Warden Hepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kalso v. Butte County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Zachary Lloyd Kalso, Erik Arthur Clarke and Robert Michael Gonzalez
Defendant:
Butte County Jail, Butte County Sheriff Dept., Keefe Supply Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas (PS) et al v. CDOC
as 1:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
LL Cool J, Ice Cube, Jay-Z and others
Defendant:
CDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ODDO et al
as 2:2024cv00226
Petitioner:
MARVIN LYLE BROWN
Respondent:
WARDEN LEMAR ODDO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hudson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00202
Petitioner:
Ice Tee Hudson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gonzalez Becerra v. ICE Officer et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Carlos Jonathan Gonzalez Becerra
Defendant:
ICE Officer, San Ysidro Detention Center, Otay Mesa Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Fletcher
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
