Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Ekwere v. Davis
as 7:2019cv00092
Petitioner:
Ime Okon Ekwere
Respondent:
Lori Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jason Jordan v. VDOC
as 17-7290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON RAMON JORDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, ASSISTANT WARDEN DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Operations of Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Defendant:
NURSE LEWIS, Counselor at Red Onion State Prison
Na'im v. Jackson et al
as 3:2017cv02121
Plaintiff:
David Na'Im
Defendant:
Eric Jackson and John Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Na'im v. Ermatinger et al
as 3:2017cv01689
Plaintiff:
David Na'Im
Defendant:
Cindy Ermatinger, Bob Carroll and Tommie Eberhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenyon Pollock v. DeEdra Hart, et al
as 16-6385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENYON MESSIAH POLLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
DEEDRA HART, ALAN BROWN, ROBERT HENNING and others
Moseley v. Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv05698
Plaintiff:
James Dale Moseley
Defendant:
Washington Department of Corrections, Ryan Pfaff, Christine Brule and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antoine LeBlanc v. Barbato et al
as 2:2016cv04329
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Avalos, Correctional Officer Avalos, Correctional Officer D. Barbato and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine LeBlanc
Morman v. Dyer et al
as 3:2016cv01523
Plaintiff:
Wade Anthony Morman
Defendant:
Michael Dyer, Quintero, E. Heller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pollock v. Hart et al
as 4:2016cv00019
Plaintiff:
Kenyon Messiah Pollock
Defendant:
DeEdra Hart, Alan Brown, Robert Henning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IMES v. WINGARD et al
as 3:2015cv00242
Plaintiff:
TOSHMINGO H. IMES
Defendant:
TREVOR A. WINGARD, DANIEL J. GEALMANN, C. WADSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
