Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Franklin v. Doyle et al
as 4:2017cv01163
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Franklin
Defendant:
Larry G. Doyle, Sharon D. Allen, John D. Stubblefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Doyle et al
as 3:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Franklin
Defendant:
Larry G. Doyle, Sharon D. Allen, John D. Stubblefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Rogers et al
as 8:2017cv00348
Plaintiff:
Tutankhamun Holt
Defendant:
Michael J. Rogers, Amy Kay Brizenoine, Baker & Tisdale, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Eppinger et al
as 1:2016cv01992
Petitioner:
Willie J Rogers
Respondent:
Lashann Eppinger, John R. Kasich, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Kirkland et al
as 3:2016cv00924
Plaintiff:
Lester W. Hill
Defendant:
Jeffrey L. Kirkland, Markus Jackson, Janet M. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTRONG v. MAILINGS UNLIMITED et al
as 1:2015cv05739
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
MAILINGS UNLIMITED, CHRISTOPHER BREEN, JON K. WEBEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Van Dyke v. Scott Slusser
as 15-6938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE, Pro Se Writer Attorney At Law Prophet Pastor Rabbi
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT SLUSSER, SEAN F. PERRIN, Attorney - Womble Carlyle Sandridge and Rice, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Rogers v. Lempke
as 9:2014cv01412
Petitioner:
Francis J. Rogers
Respondent:
John Lempke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Broadhead v. Baldwison et al
as 2:2014cv01413
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
J Baldwison, T Thomas, Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Rogers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00676
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
J. Rogers, Officer Scott, David Tytell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
