Cases 11 - 20 of 109
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Sarah Weiss
as 22-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, JOHN MEADORS, BARNEY GIESE, all three individually for damages arising from malicious prosecution and for qui tam recovery and others
Duncan v. Douglas County et al
as 2:2022cv02179
Plaintiff:
Douglas E Duncan
Defendant:
Douglas County Illinois, Nate Chaplin, Skyler Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Jerome Phillips v. Chad Bianco et al
as 5:2021cv01560
Plaintiff:
Eric Jerome Phillips, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Bianco and Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. Folts-Oberle et al
as 4:2021cv03073
Defendant:
Angela Folts-Oberle and Scott Frakes
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coward v. Clarke et al
as 7:2020cv00702
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Donnell Coward and Kelvin D. Coward
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, D. Dameron, S. Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hirano v. Sand Island Treatment Center et al
as 1:2020cv00473
Defendant:
John Does 1-200, Verizon Wireless, Kate McClory and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas A. Hirano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv08195
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1-2, John and Jane Roe 1-2 and CITY OF NEW YORK
Plaintiff:
Khyree Manson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv04460
Defendant:
MR. J. HALL, MR. WILLIAMS, III, MR. S. SWARY and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN T. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Voltz-Loomis et al v. McMaster et al
as 5:2020cv01533
Petitioner:
Allen Slaughter, Jeanne Voltz-Loomis, Jane Roes 1 through 10 and others
Respondent:
Mollie Dupriest Taylor, Dan Batson, Christopher F Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Warwick v. Doe et al
as 3:2020cv00227
Defendant:
Debbie Wilson, Joseph Breton, Stephanie McClain and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Warwick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
