Cases 11 - 20 of 75
England v. Oniya et al
as 5:2024ct03006
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David England
Defendant:
O. Oniya, D. Windley, J. Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodroff v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Woodroff
Defendant:
Shannon Smith, Adam Good, Steve Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wilke v. Dolan et al
as 2:2023cv00736
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Wilke
Defendant:
Brenden Dolan, Richard Ticcioni and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schelfe v. Perry
as 3:2023cv00162
Petitioner:
Jonathan David Schelfe
Respondent:
Warden Grady Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamblin v. Wilson
as 6:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
Jonthan David Hamblin and Jonathan David Hamblin
Respondent:
Jason Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Grenon v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv20194
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Grenon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brian Bracy v. Timothy Barbrow
as 22-6816
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN MICHAEL BRACY
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY BARBROW, Attorney, JONATHAN DAVID, Attorney/Counciler and WENDY BETH HARRIS, Office of the Public Defender
Bracy v Barbrow, et al
as 1:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Bracy
Defendant:
Timothy Barbrow, Jonathan David and Wendy Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Hewitt-El v. Michael Burgess
as 22-1188
Petitioner:
JONATHAN DAVID HEWITT-EL
Respondent:
MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Jonathan David Highley v. James S. Hill
as 2:2021cv07252
Petitioner:
Jonathan David Highley
Respondent:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
