Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Stewart v. Bludworth et al
as 1:2021cv00065
Respondent:
Austin Knudsen and Pete Bludworth
Petitioner:
Walter M. Stewart, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stewart v. Perry
as 3:2021cv00193
Respondent:
Grady Perry
Petitioner:
Joshua M Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cota #276680 v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2021cv00160
Defendant:
Thomas M Stewart, Tucson, City of and Tucson Police Department
Plaintiff:
Robert Rene Cota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Chapman
as 4:2020cv12448
Petitioner:
Cody M Stewart
Defendant:
Willis Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Bismarck Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
Laron Young
Defendant:
Bismarck Police Department, Mandan Police Department, Morton County States Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cota v. Stewart et al
as 4:2020cv00077
Defendant:
Thomas M Stewart, Timothy James Anderson and Tucson Police Department
Plaintiff:
Robert Rene Cota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reginald York v. M. Stewart, et al
as 18-15749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD RAY YORK
Defendant - Appellee:
M. STEWART, Correctional Lieutenant at Kern Valley State Prison, G. GARCIA, Correctional Sergeant at Kern Valley State Prison, J. NEIGHBORS, Correctional Sergeant at Kern Valley State Prison and others
CRAWFORD v. FRIMEL et al
as 2:2018cv01124
Plaintiff:
CARL DWAYNE CRAWFORD
Defendant:
EDWARD M. FRIMEL, VITO D. ROSELLI, RICHARD B. MARX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kavin Rhodes v. Sam Ohta, et al
as 17-16540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM OHTA, PETER SWARTH, ANTONIO BESTARD and others
Stewart v. Bailey et al
as 3:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
Jermaine M. Stewart
Defendant:
Suzann Bailey, John Baldwin, Ty Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
