Cases 11 - 20 of 226
McMullan v. Leffler et al
as 4:2023cv04089
Plaintiff:
Artez McMullan
Defendant:
Bryan Leffler, James Johnson, Paul Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turley v. Hammers et al
as 4:2023cv04071
Plaintiff:
Gregory J Turley
Defendant:
Justin Hammers, Christine Brannon-Dortch, Mark Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodman v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv04033
Plaintiff:
George P Goodman, Jr
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Christine Brannon-Dortch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Janson
as 8:2023cv01046
Petitioner:
Danny Mark Williams
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kelly v. Gallagher et al
as 4:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Mark William Kelly
Defendant:
Sean P Gallagher, Alex P Jansen, Edward C Curtain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Janson
as 1:2023cv00024
Petitioner:
Danny Mark Williams
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ollie v. Williams
as 3:2023cv00392
Petitioner:
Robert L. Ollie, Jr.
Respondent:
Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. City of Cleveland, et al
as 1:2022cv02313
Plaintiff:
Mark Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Officer Schut, Officer Rodrigues and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HOLMES v. MCKAIN et al
as 2:2022cv01612
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant:
WILLIAM WILLY D. MCKAIN, ERIN DALTON, FELICIA NOLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Salmonsen et al
as 2:2022cv00085
Petitioner:
Mark William Collins
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
