Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Ellis v. Lasalle Corrections Corp et al
as 1:2017cv00116
Defendant:
Lasalle Corrections Corp, Winn Correctional Center, Keith Deville and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Nooth
as 2:2016cv00449
Petitioner:
Jason Michael Ellis
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ELLIS v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2015cv01684
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Respondent:
MARK V. CAPOZZA, BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evans v. Reynolds
as 8:2015cv02731
Respondent:
Cecilia Reynolds
Petitioner:
Michael Ellis Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Ellis v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 15-1951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Municipality, Government Entity, OFFICER MATTHEW WHITE, City of Pittsburgh Police, Community Relations Officer, JEFFREY W. LABELLA, City of Pittsburgh Police Officer, Indv. & Entity and others
Michael Ellis v. Darryl Johnson, et al
as 15-1661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRYL L. JOHNSON, Prisoner Review Board Chief and GERALDINE TYLER
ELLIS v. REGAN et al
as 2:2014cv00004
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Defendant:
DANIEL D. REGAN, NATHAN HARPER, REGINA MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Ellis v. Antonio Valentin, et al
as 13-2504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTONIO VALENTIN, NOEL ESQUIBEL, MARY MCMAHON and others
Ellis v. Johnson et al
as 1:2013cv01177
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis
Defendant:
Darryl L Johnson, Jane Doe of 5-2-12 P.R.B hearing of Exhibit M and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. ZATECKY
as 1:2013cv00625
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
