Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Clayton v. LNU We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01151
Petitioner: Michael Shawn Clayton
Respondent: FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ford v. USA
as 1:2018cv00141
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Michael Shawn Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Roscoe v. USA
as 2:2018cv00307
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Michael Shawn Roscoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Billups v. Western Regional Jail et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv03788
Plaintiff: Michael Shawn Billups
Defendant: Western Regional Jail, Medical Staff, Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Hallcy v. Ken Coughlin, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-10749
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK DEWAYNE HALLCY
Defendant - Appellee: KEN COUGHLIN, Chief of Police, DAVID MULL, Sheriff, COBY NIELL, Detective, City of Plainview Police Department and others
Anderson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv00314
Petitioner: Michael Shawn Anderson
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sadler v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2017cv00045
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Michael Shawn Sadler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scroggins v. Blades
as 1:2017cv00031
Petitioner: Michael Shawn Scroggins
Respondent: Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scroggins v. Blades We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00494
Petitioner: Michael Shawn Scroggins
Respondent: Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hallcy v. Coughlin et al
as 5:2016cv00252
Plaintiff: Mark DeWayne Hallcy
Defendant: Ken Coughlin, David Mull, Coby Niell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?