Cases 11 - 20 of 19,518
McMillian v. Colon et al
as 7:2024cv05522
Defendant:
Brooks, B. Colon, J. Fransco and others
Plaintiff:
Nasir McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bixby et al v. Stirling et al
as 3:2024cv05072
Plaintiff:
Brad Keith Sigmon, Steven V Bixby, Freddie Eugene Owens and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Bryan P Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
De Los Santos v. Jeffreys et al
as 4:2024cv03168
Respondent:
Neb. Dept. Corr. Services and Rob Jeffreys
Petitioner:
Anthony P. De Los Santos
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NARCISSE v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
EDWARD NARCISSE
Defendant:
A. GARCIA, P. THOMPSON, SECRETARY OF DOC LINDA HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
SCOTTY BROWN
Defendant:
P. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CORDER v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv01303
Defendant:
P. THOMAS, JOHN DOE 1, MR DUBISH and others
Plaintiff:
MANASSEH NASA CORDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Halstead et al
as 1:2024cv06855
Defendant:
Angelo Narcise, Elijah Ford, Shaffer and others
Plaintiff:
Donnie P. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick L. Johnson v. Samantha P. Jessner et al
as 2:2024cv07683
Respondent:
Samantha P. Jessner and Attorney General Rob Bonta
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Bailey et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Defendant:
CO 1 Unknown Riley, Sgt. Unknown Heth, Andrew Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Quinton Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
