Cases 11 - 20 of 133
Ricky Butler v. Edward Hull
as 22-6903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT EDWARD HULL, a/k/a Ted Hull, NURSE HRYN, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT PHYLLIS BACK, a/k/a Back and others
Defendant:
NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL and NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL BOARD
Walker v. USA
as 3:2022cv02011
Petitioner:
Meko R Walker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walker v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2022cv01162
Plaintiff:
James E. Walker
Defendant:
D. Brookhart, Ethan McQueen, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raul Arellano v. Sedighi, et al
as 22-55310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
SEDIGHI, Doctor, R. WALKER, Chief Physician and Surgeon, S. ROBERTS, M.D.; Chief Medical Executive and others
Beard v. Adams et al
as 4:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Francisco Beard
Defendant:
Adams, Baker, Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solomon v. Youker et al
as 3:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Kendall Dejuan Solomon
Defendant:
f/n/u Youker, (f/n/u) Gray, f/n/u Riccardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. KINSAUL et al
as 5:2021cv00126
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT, BILL KINSAUL, CITY OF PANAMA CITY and others
Plaintiff:
JASON BRADLEY SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Helder et al
as 5:2020cv05194
Defendant:
Karas Medical Service, John and Jane Doe Employees of Karas, Sgt. Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2020cv00088
Defendant:
J RICKS, JOE CHAPMAN, COREY WARD and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ESTEN WILLIAMS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. USA
as 3:2020cv00463
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ricky R. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
