Cases 11 - 20 of 200
Hale v. The City of Roswell Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
Donte Leon Hale
Defendant:
The City of Roswell Police Department, Officer C.T. Jackson, J. Ruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherrod v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sherrod
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, C Howard, Unknown Behle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Owens v. Walker et al
as 4:2022cv01687
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
Chloe Walker, Amber Warick, Coran Phiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Village of Steger et al
as 1:2022cv05886
Plaintiff:
Ce'Andre Moore
Defendant:
Village of Steger, Peter Fajman, Thomas D'Anna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. El Paso County Deputy et al.
as 3:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
El Paso County Deputy, Nathaniel Pierce, D. Bridges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruff v. Ohio Reformatory for Women
as 2:2022cv03439
Plaintiff:
Starlette Ruff and Starlette S. Batrez
Defendant:
Ohio Reformatory for Women
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Andrew Willis v. Mark Ruff
as 22-7055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW REGINALD WILLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK C. RUFF, OFFICER KELLY TUDOR and SGT. JAMES YOWELL
Todd Ashker v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 22-16162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD LEWIS ASHKER
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, SCOTT KERNAN, GEORGE GIURBINO and others
Ruff v. Sage
as 1:2022cv01032
Petitioner:
Robert A. Ruff
Respondent:
Warden Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ruff v. Deas et al
as 5:2022ct03186
Plaintiff:
Marquette Ruff
Defendant:
Sgt. Deas, C/O B. Molander and Correctional Officer Appenheimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
