Cases 11 - 20 of 183
Emery Barron v. Wetzel, et al
as 23-1699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMERY BARRON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS (DOC/PA), KEVIN RANSOM, WARDEN OF SCI-DALLAS, S. MILLER, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT FOR CENTRALIZED SERVICE and others
Tretchler v. Miller
as 1:2023cv00366
Petitioner:
Zachary Charles Tretchler
Respondent:
Brian S. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Miller v. El Dorado County Jail
as 2:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Ronald S. Miller
Defendant:
El Dorado County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Miller
as 1:2023cv00326
Petitioner:
John Douglas Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Brian S. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kimbrough v. Hogan et al
as 8:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Quintan J. Kimbrough
Defendant:
A. Hogan, III, Johathan B. Gorden, Michael J. Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paul Johnson v. A. Cuevas, et al
as 22-16394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. CUEVAS, RON DAVIS, T. ALLEN and others
Dillard v. Davis
as 22-10791
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel D. Dillard
Defendant / Appellee:
Lorie Davis, Former Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jimmy S. Smith, Senior Warden, Andrea B. Lozada, former Assistant Warden and others
Miller v. Flemming
as 5:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Timothy S Miller
Defendant:
FNU Flemming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Black
as 1:2022cv00662
Petitioner:
Otis S. Miller
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casby v. McConnell et al
as 1:2022cv00873
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Casby
Defendant:
Warden McConnell, HIPPA Ceo, M Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
