Cases 11 - 20 of 247
Wilborn v. Wang et al
as 7:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Wilborn
Defendant:
Dr. Lawrence Shu Chang Wang, Dr. Ohia and Dr. Mark Amonette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayns v. Shu Staff
as 3:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Guy Mayns
Defendant:
Shu Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilborn v. Wang et al
as 2:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Wilborn
Defendant:
Dr. Lawrence Shu Chang Wang, Dr. Ohia and Dr. Mark Amonette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Waters v. BOP, et al
as 23-2918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS WATERS
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY POLLUCK, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY FLORENCE and others
Straker v. Stancil, et al
as 23-1311
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDERSON STRAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
STANCIL, Warden, ROOT, Captain, MOORE, Lieutentant and others
(PC) Chinsami v. Tan
as 2:2023cv01809
Plaintiff:
Shu Chinsami
Defendant:
Tan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON-BEY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
HANEEF SHAKE EL JACKSON-BEY
Defendant:
S. KALLIS, UNKNOWN NAMED OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR (A.R.C.), A. FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard, et al
as 23-15567
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL COBB
Defendant / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex warden at USP-Tucson, K WERNER, SOMP Coordinator/ Psychologist at USP-Tucson, L UNRUH-PARKER, SOMP Psychologist at USP-Tucson and others
(PC) Chinsami v. Cueva
as 2:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Shu Chinsami
Defendant:
Daniel Cueva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corey Hood v. Bureau of Prisons
as 23-6114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY DEANDRE HOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, BELLAMY, Lieutenant, OFFICER WHITE, R&D Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
