Cases 11 - 20 of 57
HAILE v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00171
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE, J M ODEN and MARK S INCH
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN HAIL, SR, MJLSE CHRISTIAN HAIL, SR and JOHN HAILE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAIL v. TENTH JUDICIAL SAO et al
as 3:2021cv00654
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, ASHLEY MOODY, GERARD and others
Plaintiff:
JON SANDERSON CHRIS HAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. Dong et al
as 1:2021cv01435
Defendant:
Kennestone Hospital, J. A. King, Deputy Shelat and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Vickers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolson v. State Farm Correctional Center
as 2:2021cv00123
Defendant:
State Farm Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Timothy Narvaro Tolson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. State Farm Womens Work Center
as 1:2020cv00796
Defendant:
State Farm Womens Work Center
Plaintiff:
Stephanie K. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burks v. State Farm et al
as 2:2019cv00167
Defendant:
Ashley Tyler and State Farm
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Duane Burks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nischwitz v. Tazwell County Justice Center Correctional Healthcare
as 1:2018cv01391
Defendant:
Tazwell County Justice Center Correctional Healthcare, Hannah LNU, Tazwell County Sheriffs Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Nischwitz V and Edmond Nischwitz, V
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARDEN v. STATE FARM INSURANCE
as 1:2018cv01436
Plaintiff:
DAVID GARDEN
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Gilligan v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 3:2018cv08097
Plaintiff:
Jerry Gilligan
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Mutual
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Rochester, NY et al
as 1:2017cv01842
Plaintiff:
Fitzalbert Fuller, Jr.
Defendant:
Rochester, NY, Living Word Restoration, McDonalds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
