Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Showers v. Kosterman et al
as 2:2020cv01245
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel A Showers
Defendant:
Jessica L Studzinski, Linda R Kosterman, Carolyn S Hagerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2020cv01411
Defendant:
S. Pasquale, Dr. Dancha, John DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Simms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trice v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00046
Defendant:
Deputy Officer FNU Wilcox, Counselor Veronica Stewart, Deputy Officer FNU Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Demond Trice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbee v. Holliday et al
as 4:2020cv00123
Plaintiff:
Sylvester O Barbee
Defendant:
Doc Holliday, Brawley, Does Direct Supervision Management, Heath Service(s) Coordinator, Code(s) and Regualtion(s), Environmental Service(s) Coordinator, Admin. Shower Sanitation and Power Washing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruffin v. Rawls et al
as 5:2018cv00591
Defendant:
Whitney White, Ms. FNU Holtzapple, FNU Kemp and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ravon Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIS v. MAIRONA et al
as 3:2018cv02117
Defendant:
TRACEY WORRELL, K SHOWERS, SANDRA MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
PLEDGE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VITKA v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2018cv00220
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, CORRECTIONS OFFICER WOLTON, PREA COORDINATOR and others
Plaintiff:
SHANE VITKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jerome Showers v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 17-15122
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEROME D. SHOWERS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Walker v. Ramierz et al
as 1:2017cv01938
Plaintiff:
Cedric Tyrone Walker
Defendant:
P. Ramirez, Amy Schoonover, Jeana Mitterling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Showers v. Correct Care Solutions
as 2:2017cv13150
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Showers
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
