Cases 11 - 20 of 371
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malik v. Reed College et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Keith Shazad Malik
Defendant:
Reed College, John Young Taft, Kater Murch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J Swift
Defendant:
Doe and Clint Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKnatt v. Faust et al
as 3:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth McKnatt
Defendant:
N Faust, Amy Adams, Robert Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scarver v. Swift et al
as 3:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Stasia Scarver
Defendant:
Johnnie Swift, Levi McDougal, Q Stinnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv02872
Plaintiff:
Wendell Roy Mitchell
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Penny Kemp, Greg Abbot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Thompson et al
as 3:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jakita S Murphy
Defendant:
Phillip Thompson, Johnnie Swift and Does Entitled Entities of AR Department of Corrections Security, Maintenace, and Fire and Safety Deparments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taebel v. Swift
as 2:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Taebel and Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Taylor Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McSean v. Hacker et al
as 4:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Kelly McSean
Defendant:
Denise Hacker, George Killian, William Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
