Cases 11 - 20 of 74
Aliahmed et al v. Kondash et al
as 1:2020cv01097
Plaintiff:
Kelly E.S. Aliahmed, Evonca Sakinah S. Aliahmed, Muhammad Aliahmed and others
Defendant:
Lt. Ruth E. Dixon, Bureau Chief Shane Troxler, Deputy Warden John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trader v. Sherman et al
as 5:2020cv02908
Defendant:
Nurse Sherman, Medical Director Provider, Probation Parole and Pardon and others
Plaintiff:
Richard K Trader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Maryland State et al
as 1:2020cv00343
Defendant:
ECI, Kevin Teves, Mark Schoenfelder and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TRADER v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 2:2019cv04019
Petitioner:
OSSIE TRADER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TRADER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv03961
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
OSSIE ROBERT TRADER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sims-Lewis v. Trader et al
as 1:2019cv02001
Defendant:
Gov. Larry Hogan, Lt. Johnson, Ms. McCabe and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Eugene Sims-Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Savoca v. O'Neill et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Josh Hank, Jack Remally, Gary Arbeswsek and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Savoca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trader v. CO. Hatcher et al
as 2:2018cv00132
Plaintiff:
Paul D. Trader
Defendant:
FNP, Hatcher and Sullivan County Jail Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Hawaii State Court et al
as 1:2017cv00490
Plaintiff:
Rodney Wells Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Hawaii State Court, Judge Trader and Craig Nagamine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 17-2319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD WILLEY, R. CARTER, E. HEDDINGER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
