Cases 11 - 20 of 30
USA v. Garrett Door, Sr.
as 18-35545
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GARRETT DEAN DOOR, Sr.
Ronald Kupsky v. Ramelle Blintz, et al
as 18-1986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. KUPSKY
Defendant - Appellee:
RAMELLE BLINTZ, DOOR COUNTY ADVOCATE and GANNETT COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Kupsky v. Blintz et al
as 1:2018cv00585
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lema Kupsky
Defendant:
Ramelle Blintz, Door County Advocate and Gannett Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Door v. USA
as 1:2017cv00119
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Garrett Dean Door, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rindahl v. Avera Medical Group Bd of Directors & Administrators (Mckennan) et al
as 4:2017cv04104
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Defendant:
Avera Medical Group Bd of Directors & Administrators (Mckennan), Avera Medical Group Bd of Directors & Administrators (St. Lukes), Unknown Emergency Room Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURCHAM v. HENNING et al
as 1:2017cv00168
Plaintiff:
RICHARD STEPHEN BURCHAM
Defendant:
HENNING, MEDICAL STAFF, INMATES WHO GOVERN BARTER AND TRADING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Door v. Frakes
as 8:2016cv00553
Petitioner:
Duop Door
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paschke v. Door County Jail et al
as 2:2016cv01494
Plaintiff:
Samuel L Paschke
Defendant:
Door County Jail, Brian Barganz, Candice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Byl et al
as 2:2016cv00422
Defendant:
Neil F. Byl, Megan Door, Alex Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. GARDEN CITY GROUP et al
as 1:2015cv00259
Plaintiff:
ROY OLIVER CAMPBELL
Defendant:
GARDEN CITY GROUP, JULIE CHAVEZ, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
