Cases 11 - 20 of 120
Holder v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Dexter Deangelo Holder
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Col Holden, Col Tillery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillery v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Jason Tillery and Jerry Lanier
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Correctional Medical Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Damontaze Tillery
as 23-6126
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAMONTAZE MONTRELL TILLERY, a/k/a Country
(PC) Jacques v. Tillery
as 2:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jacques
Defendant:
D. Tillery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TILLERY v. HIGUERA et al
as 1:2022cv06638
Plaintiff:
DAVID MARK TILLERY
Defendant:
E. HIGUERA and NAZAROVICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lamon v. McTaggart et al
as 2:2022at01131
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
K. McTaggart, D. Laughlin, J. Filippello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lamon v. McTaggart et al
as 1:2022cv01421
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
K. McTaggart, D. Laughlin, J. Filippello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillery v. Calloway et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Billy Frank Tillery, Jr.
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, State of Alabama and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tillery v. Calloway et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Billy Frank Tillery, Jr.
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TILLERY v. BERGAMI
as 1:2022cv00477
Petitioner:
DAVID MARK TILLERY
Respondent:
THOMAS E. BERGAMI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
