Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Griffin Jr. v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2017cv03019
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Griffin Jr.
Defendant:
John W. Hickenlooper, Richard F. Raemisch, Richard (I) F. Raemisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jevon Everett v. Hann, et al
as 17-2673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEVON A. EVERETT
Defendant - Appellee:
C/O HANN, C/O RODGER, SGT PIERCE and others
Steve Crump v. Union Supply Direct Vendor Company
as 2:2016cv00140
Plaintiff:
Steve Crump
Defendant:
Union Supply Direct Vendor Company
Steve Crump v. Union Supply Direct Vendor Company
as 2:2015cv07407
Plaintiff:
Steve Crump
Defendant:
Union Supply Direct Vendor Company
JONES v. NCDPS et al
as 1:2015cv00234
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEWIS JONES
Defendant:
NCDPS, FRANK L. PERRY, LYNN C. SUMMERS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormack, Alan v. Department of Corrections, et al.
as 3:2012cv00924
Plaintiff:
Alan David McCormack
Defendant:
Department of Corrections , Division of Adult Institutions, Gary Hamblin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dayson #213123 et al v. Access et al
as 2:2012cv00450
Plaintiff:
James Michael Dayson #213123
Defendant:
Access, Union Supply Direct, Jack L. Marcus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormack, Alan et al v. Hamblin, Gary et al
as 3:2012cv00535
Plaintiff:
Alan David McCormack, All Other Similarly Situated Wisconsin State Inmates and Citizens of Wisconsin, et al.
Defendant:
Gary H. Hamblin , Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kathryn R. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdul-Salim et al v. Turner et al
as 3:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
Sadiq Hafiz Abdul-Salim and Yahya Bilal Muhammad Siddiq
Defendant:
Ron Turner, Catherine Posey, Debra Inglis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sly v. Access Secure Pak et al
as 2:2009cv00142
Petitioner:
Charles Sly
Respondent:
Access Secure Pak and Union Supply Direct
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
