Cases 11 - 20 of 145
Wilde v. Dismas Charities
as 5:2023cv04016
Petitioner:
Justin Wilde
Respondent:
Dismas Charities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bishop-McKean v. Wild et al
as 3:2023cv05189
Plaintiff:
Renee Christine Bishop-McKean
Defendant:
Wild and Securus Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Moore v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN DALE MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Director, CHARLES L RYAN, Former Director, TRUJILLO, Regional Director, Unknown and others
Wilds v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
as 2:2022cv03274
Petitioner:
Johnny Wilds
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilds v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
as 1:2022cv00508
Petitioner:
Johnny Wilds
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILDS v. FORSYTH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
DONTAY WILDS
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY JAIL, RON FREEMAN, CORRECT CARE SOLITIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayborne v. Schmidt et al
as 2:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jack A Clayborne
Defendant:
Dale Schmidt, Sgt Polsin, Sgt Kuehl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Wild et al
as 2:2021cv01056
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hall
Defendant:
LT Abbigate Wild, Lt Gahn, Eric Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSES v. WILDE et al
as 1:2021cv00480
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, Anthony Wilde and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Petitioner:
Pete L. Moses, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moses v. Wilde et al
as 5:2021hc02128
Respondent:
United States, Anthony Wilde and State of North Carolina
Petitioner:
Pete L. Moses, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
