Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Vreeland v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv01684
Defendant:
Scott Dauffenbach, Adrienne Jacobson-Sanchez, CDOC Central Classification Supervisor and others
Plaintiff:
Delmart Vreeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Nocco et al
as 8:2021cv00169
Defendant:
Homewav L.L.C. and Chris Nocco
Plaintiff:
Bruce William Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. SUPERNTENDENT, SCI FOREST et al
as 2:2020cv06124
Respondent:
SUPERNTENDENT, SCI FOREST, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Petitioner:
WILLIAM ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patton v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2020cv01685
Defendant:
Blain Rogers, Unknown Braley, Unknown Batista and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard A Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wahl v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00068
Defendant:
Kip Laury, Aaron Hofer, Corizon, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chad L Wahl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Si Futentes et al
as 2:2018cv00463
Plaintiff:
William Rogers
Defendant:
G. Miller, Philip Si Futentes and Kody Schur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Kwarteng et al
as 2:2018cv00421
Defendant:
John Doe, University Of Texas Medical Branch, M Goyel and others
Plaintiff:
William Rogers
Interested Party:
Edward Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElvine v. Beaver et al
as 3:2018cv00315
Plaintiff:
Jenyon R. McElvine
Defendant:
Ken Beaver, Edwar Gazoo, William Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Nanos et al
as 4:2016cv00310
Plaintiff:
William Rogers
Defendant:
Chris Nanos, Unknown Parties, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Walmart Home Office et al
as 8:2015cv00272
Defendant:
Amanda and Walmart Home Office
Plaintiff:
William Rogers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
