Cases 21 - 30 of 2,319
Evans v. Atkins et al
as 1:2024cv01749
Plaintiff:
Clarence Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
C.O. Atkins, C.O. John Doe 1, C.O. John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darius Gilkey v. Sherman Campbell
as 24-1161
Petitioner:
DARIUS LEIGH GILKEY
Respondent:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden
(PC) DeLeon v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Vincent DeLeon
Defendant:
Bryan Phillips, J. Ervin, J. Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oby v. Green
as 24-60083
Plaintiff:
Sherman Oby
Defendant:
Justin Green, Roderick Logan, Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and others
Bonds v. Jones
as 24-30104
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bonds
Defendant:
Sherman Jones, in his individual capacity, Justin Barnes, in his individual capacity and Bayou Correctional Management Company, L.L.C.
Song v. Tharp et al
as 5:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Rainier Song
Defendant:
DA Jennifer Tharp, Sherman Krause and Unknown NBPD Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PARSONS v. RANSOME A MALE NATIVE et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
DANIELL BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
RANSOME A MALE NATIVE, RANSOME MALE NATIVE SUBORDANT, MS. HARDGOOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Campbell
as 4:2023cv13254
Petitioner:
Kenneth Arlell Young
Defendant:
Warden Sherman Campbell
Respondent:
Sherman Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
THOMAS v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2023cv02134
Petitioner:
SHERMAN THOMAS
Respondent:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL and WARDEN OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
