Cases 21 - 30 of 673
Anton Joshua v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6860
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTON NELSON JOSHUA
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON
Porch v. McClain (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Deonte Anton Porch
Defendant:
Antonio McClain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61487
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hampton v. City of Loves Park Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv50273
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE ANTON HAMPTON
Defendant:
CITY OF LOVES PARK ILLINOIS, WINNEBAGO COUNTY ILLINOIS, CITY OF LOVES PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hamilton, Jr. v. Stuff
as 1:2023cv01465
Petitioner:
Anton D. Hamilton, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Angela Stuff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Joseph
as 5:2023cv03423
Petitioner:
Mario Anton Lee
Respondent:
Warden Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alexander v. New York City et al
as 1:2023cv07027
Plaintiff:
Anton Alexander
Defendant:
New York City, Department of Corrections, NYC and Unnamed Employees of the State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starkgraf v. White et al
as 3:2023cv05593
Plaintiff:
Kristopher S Starkgraf
Defendant:
White, Pierce County Sheriffs Department, Place and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Urbikas v. CCDOC et al
as 1:2023cv03572
Plaintiff:
Anton L. Urbikas
Defendant:
CCDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
