Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Thomas v. Aramark Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv50140
Plaintiff:
Fredrick D. Thomas
Defendant:
Aramark Inc. and Rebecca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker #132271 v. Wener et al
as 2:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
L T Tucker #132271
Defendant:
Aramark Inc. , A. Wener and Unknown Newhouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Smart v. The Dept. of Corrections for Queens Anne County et al
as 8:2017cv03606
Plaintiff:
Salahuddin F Smart
Defendant:
The Dept. of Corrections for Queens Anne County, Aramark Inc, Mears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Aramark Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00824
Plaintiff:
Aaron Thomas
Defendant:
Aramark Inc and Commissary/Icaregifts.com
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER ETAL et al v. WOLF
as 2:2015cv05431
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
JOEZIEL VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staake v. Barrela et al
as 1:2015cv00715
Plaintiff:
Mark Staake
Defendant:
FNU Barrela, Corizon, Inc., Tammy Rush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Orange County Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv01287
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lamar Bryant
Defendant:
Aramark Inc. and Mark Trinadad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendricks v. Aramark Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02015
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hendricks
Defendant:
Aramark Inc, Ms. Williams, Ms. Stoner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salahuddin Smart v. Aramark Inc, et al
as 14-3782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAMARK INC, JEFFREY BURRELL, ARAMARK SUPERVISOR, CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
SMART v. ARAMARK INC. et al
as 1:2014cv03007
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant:
ARAMARK INC., JEFFREY BURRELL, CAMDEN COUNTY DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
