Cases 21 - 30 of 296
Paul Beatty v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 23-1252
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL WILLIAM BEATTY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY VENANGO COUNTY
Hawthorne v. Lloyd et al
as 2:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Royce Lancil Hawthorne and Royce Laneil Hawthorne
Defendant:
Robert Lloyd, Josue Ayala, Alan Beathe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley Monical v. Mike Winters, et al
as 23-35042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRADLEY WILLIAM MONICAL
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE WINTERS, Sheriff, COREY FALLS, Sheriff, PENDLAND, Lt. and others
Jeter v. Cole et al
as 7:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Columbus Jeter, III
Defendant:
Sr. Joseph Derham Cole, J. Mark Hayes, III, Ralph Keith Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aaron Obeginski v. Beattie, et al
as 22-13810
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON LEIGH OBEGINSKI
Defendant / Appellee:
BEATTIE, HARDY, HATTIE and others
John Whyde, Jr. v. Paul Sigsworth, et al
as 22-3916
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN WHYDE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL A SIGSWORTH, sued in his individual capacity and official capacity as Sheriff of Erie County, Ohio, ERIE COUNTY, OH, sued through the Erie County Board of Commissioners who are named only in their official capacities, ERIE COUNTY GENERAL HEALTH DISTRICT BOARD OF HEALTH, sued in its official capacity and others
Beatty v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv03658
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lane Beatty
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Daniel Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beatty v. Lumpkin
as 22-70010
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tracy Lane Beatty
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
