Cases 21 - 30 of 257
RANDOLPH v. MOORE et al
as 2:2023cv00796
Plaintiff:
BRIAN RANDOLPH
Defendant:
JUSTIN MOORE, LARRY BOGGS, ERIC HAAG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CORBETT v. ANDREWS et al
as 1:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY CORBETT
Defendant:
BRIAN ANDREWS, ANDREW BOGGS, DETECTIVE ALEEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steffin McFall v. Sergeant Bass, et al
as 23-1690
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEFFIN T. MCFALL
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT BASS and BETTY BOGGS, Nurse
Ferebee v. Skinner et al
as 7:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Lorenza Gerald Ferebee, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Skinner, S. Birman, S. Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edson Gelin v. Emmett Boggs, Jr., et al
as 23-10565
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDSON GELIN
Defendant / Appellee:
EMMETT JACKSON BOGGS, JR. and MICHAEL A. DRAKE
Kay Dana v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-35047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAY LYNN DANA, FKA Larry Dana
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSH TEWALT, BREE DERRICK and others
Simmons v. Tehum Care Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04149
Plaintiff:
Pati Simmons
Defendant:
Tehum Care Services, Inc. doing business as Corizon Health, Inc., Kavita Pendurthi, Mary A Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcum v. Capp et al
as 2:2022cv02160
Plaintiff:
Ronald Marcum
Defendant:
Sarah Capp, Abby Yarbrough, David Saxon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boggs v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Boggs
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Godwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boggs v. PrimeCare Medical Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv01312
Plaintiff:
Steven Boggs
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical Inc., Diane Wolf and Nurse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
