Cases 21 - 30 of 715
Adams v. Shelby
as 23-20108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
Tammy Shelby, Central Grievance Office, Michael Carvajal, Federal Bureau of Prisons Director, Mike Piasiensk, Inspector General and others
Shade v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
John William Shade, III
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice, Jason Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toaz v. Albright et al
as 3:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Craig Alan Toaz
Defendant:
Zachary Albright, Curtis Rothermel, R. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fitch v. USA
as 23-40131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lamont Fitch
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Merrick B. Garland, Christopher Wray and others
Hajati v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
George Hajati
Defendant:
United States Of America, Williams Barr, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. CUSHWA et al
as 2:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, ERICK HELENIHI, CHRISTOPHER WHITMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Shelby et al
as 4:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Tammy Shelby, Michael Carvajal, Mike Piasiensk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Alatary
as 9:2023cv00193
Petitioner:
Jamell Mason
Respondent:
Alatary, Patrick McFarland and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reed v. Michael, et al. et al
as 3:2023cv00100
Defendant:
Michael, et al., Mike, Phillip Cornelious and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carvajal v. USA
as 1:2023cv00040
Petitioner:
Jose Carvajal
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
