Cases 21 - 30 of 705
Bracewell v. Smith et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00710
Defendant:
Joann Gulidge, Donald Mitchell, Alabama Corrections Industries and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Bracewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Cooper et al
as 4:2020cv00757
Defendant:
David Taylor, Rick Cooper and Arkansas Correctional Industries
Plaintiff:
David Ray Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ziegler et al v. Correctional Industries et al
as 3:2020cv05288
Defendant:
Susan Pierini, David Edwards, Scott Light and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ziegler, Alvin Hegge and Jeffrey Scott Ziegler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOEL v. DUPREE et al
as 1:2020cv00809
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, DUPREE, KRAMER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES FRANK NOEL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrary v. McDougal et al
as 5:2020cv00221
Plaintiff:
Timothy E McCrary
Defendant:
Georgia Correctional Industries, James Robberson, Carl Bear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUCAS v. ALVEY et al
as 1:2020cv00653
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., BETH FAUST, FRANK WOODS and others
Plaintiff:
KEETH EUGUENE LUCAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Angerhofer et al
as 2:2020cv00014
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Defendant:
Utah Correctional Industries, Shane Nelson, Laura Cook and others
Plaintiff:
James Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FLYNN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2019cv04852
Defendant:
SHIFT CAPTAIN, LIVELY, INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS and others
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE FLYNN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PROFFITT v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2019cv02906
Defendant:
PAUL JACKSON, INDIANA CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES and WENDY KNIGHT
Plaintiff:
DAVID PROFFITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv01736
Plaintiff:
Gregory Morris Sanders
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Davis Sloan, Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
