Cases 21 - 30 of 87
DANIEL v. DREW et al
as 4:2016cv00763
Plaintiff:
THADDEUS D DANIEL
Defendant:
DARLENE DREW, HARRY S MATTICE, JR, ELEANOR L ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billingsley v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00748
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Neal Billingsley
Defendant:
D. Daniels, Alabama Department of Corrections, Phyllis Billups and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel v. Drew
as 1:2016cv03099
Petitioner:
Thaddeus D. Daniel
Respondent:
Darlene Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Darren Talbert v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 16-1955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREN TALBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DELAWARE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN J. WHELAN, District Attorney, Delaware County, PA and others
TALBERT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv01041
Plaintiff:
DARREN TALBERT
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DELAWARE COUNTY, PA, JOHN J. WHELAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Wexford et al
as 1:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Jovan D. Daniels
Defendant:
Wexford, Obaisi, C.A.O and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel v. State of Georgia
as 1:2015cv02256
Petitioner:
Alan D. Daniel
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel #537193 v. Johns et al
as 2:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Phillip Johns, Ben Mercier, Chad Lacount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel #537193 v. Johns et al
as 2:2014cv00166
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Phillip Johns, Ben Mercier, Chad Lacount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Northwest Medical Center, Bentonville, Arkansas
as 5:2014cv05173
Plaintiff:
Scottie D. Daniels
Defendant:
Northwest Medical Center, Bentonville, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.