Cases 21 - 30 of 2,601
Edward Sartoris v. Haidle, et al
as 24-1871
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SARTORIS
Defendant:
WARDEN HAIDLE, SGT. ZITO, Correctional Officer and DEPUTY WARDEN MCCOY
Mauder v. Petri et al
as 1:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mauder
Defendant:
CO Petri, Lt. Rosinski and Deputy Warden Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forester-Hoare v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Sean Forester-Hoare
Defendant:
Dr Freeman, Dr Lavoie, Baier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Callahan v. Levasseur et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Ryan Callahan
Defendant:
C/O Levasseur, Jeff Laurie, C/O Giorgi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas Vontz v. Jeanine Winger, et al
as 24-1386
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS VONTZ
Defendant:
JEANINE C. WINGER, Acting Deputy Warden, KYLE NUTTALL, Corrections Officer and JUAN FIERO, Corrections Officer
Robert Annabel, II v. Sherman Campbell, et al
as 24-1322
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden, DAVID MESSER, CHRISTINA BATES and others
Guillot v. Wade
as 24-30247
Plaintiff:
Dylan Guillot
Defendant:
Warden Wade, Asst Warden Dear, Deputy Warden Cupp and others
Norman Pryor v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 24-3301
Plaintiff:
NORMAN LAFONTE PRYOR, aka Nc LaFonse Pryor
Defendant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director of ODRC, In their individual and official capacity, LIEUTINENT ARIANNA BROCK, In their individual and official capacity, M. DARKANGELO, Mental Health Administrator, In their individual and official capacity and others
Bobby Robertson v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-1745
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Robertson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, ADC, James Gibson, Warden, James Shipman, Deputy Warden, Varner Supermax and others
Lenz v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv01510
Plaintiff:
Dakota Lenz
Defendant:
Warden Deshawn Jones, Deputy Warden Polite and Lt Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
