Cases 21 - 30 of 306
Burkeen v. Paxton
as 4:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
Dell Burkeen, II
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Grant v. Ken Clark
as 22-55177
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCUS DELL GRANT
Respondent / Appellee:
KEN CLARK, Warden
Robinson v. Jacobs
as 5:2022cv00531
Plaintiff:
Gary Dell Robinson, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. McClaim et al
as 3:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
M McClaim, Mississippi County Detention Center, Haley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. United States
as 2:2021cv01142
Petitioner:
Glenn Dell Cook
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BIDDLE v. PERTORIUS et al
as 1:2021cv02660
Plaintiff:
MARK E. BIDDLE
Defendant:
PERTORIUS, ROBBERT CARTER, JR., JEREMY JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway, Jr. v. Schur
as 5:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Arthur R Holloway, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Schur, Kody R. Schur, Jacqueline Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Westville Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Defendant:
Westville Correctional Facility, Galipeau, Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diarra v. Sheriff, Dekalb County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00820
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Defendant:
Sheriff, Dekalb County Jail, Dell Technology or Computer and Sheriff, Cobb County Detention Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Eighmy et al
as 6:2021cv03238
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allen Smith, Jr., Linsay Sue McGinnis, W.J.S. and others
Defendant:
Eric Dell Eighmy, Taney County 46th Judicial Court, Taney County Probate Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
