Cases 21 - 30 of 4,203
Martin v. 195th Jud Dist Ct Criminal
as 24-10383
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Martin
Defendant:
195th Judicial District Court Criminal District Court No. 2
Garcia v. U S Government
as 24-40294
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
U S Government and District Court of Guadelupe County, Texas
Barnes v. Fifth Judicial District Court et al
as 1:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
Charles D.J. Barnes
Respondent:
Fifth Judicial District Court and Attorney General State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Leal v. Lumpkin, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Leal
Respondent:
371st District Court of Tarrant County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reevis v. Eastern State Hospital et al
as 2:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
Eastern State Hospital, US District Court, US Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gladney v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona et al
as 4:2024cv00218
Petitioner:
Jeffery Daniel Gladney
Respondent:
United States District Court for the District of Arizona and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reevis v. US District Court et al
as 2:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
US District Court, Spokane County Superior Court, US Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. 19th Judicial District Court et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Reginald Davis
Defendant:
19th Judicial District Court and Dana Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rickey Benson v. Sheryl Lipman
as 24-5381
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
SHERYL H. LIPMAN, Chief U.S. District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
